Rema menrmEIT Ao TLIC A
Wr RAPS PAWEL Nee ot the F
NRT FOV
IRDECTION OF NAY AL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR9699-14
9 Oct 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC L552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
8 October 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser
N130C4/14U1165 dated 4 September 2014, & COPY of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entitr
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficien
establ error or inju
igh the existence of probable material
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with
tained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your ap
your request for a personal appearance before the Board have been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NPS69S-14
rection of an official naval
Consequently, when applying for a cor
demonstrate the existence of
record, the burden is on the applicant to
probable material error or injustice.
ZILCO VE
. ROBERT J. U' NRL
Executive Director
CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1165 —_— 4
Enclosure:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2478 14
A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence igs evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2628 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1228 dated 18 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR2628-14 on of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a correcti demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1916 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 bJCc Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C4/14U1218 dated 17 September 2014, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12381 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C4/12U0026 dated 10 Feb 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5674 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5674-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0985 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 7220 Ser w13004/1400681 of 29 May 14, 4 copy of which is attached and was previously provided to you and to which you have not responded. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2386 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U0912 dated 16 October 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4696 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1070 dated > a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 10006-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5701 13
Jn your case, the Board agreed with the advisory opinions that, because you did not gain and maintain proficiency in the community and for the NEC that you received the bonus, in the Board’s view, recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonus was appropriate. After reviewing all the circumstances in your case, in the Board’s view, the decision to recoup the unearned portion of the bonus was just, and the half separation pay you received was properly awarded according the Separation...